The “global elite”, formerly referred to as the “military-industrial complex”, now  known as the, “digital-financial complex”, was able to pull it off unrestrainedly. London and Paris, knowing that they had two vigorous allies loitering in the background, did not hesitate long. Two days later both declared war on Germany.

Now the long-awaited war had broken out, the driving forces behind the outbreak of war and the avalanche of brutal civilization ruptures, which as expected, would break out on all fronts, had to be concealed at any cost. To this end, the anti-German wave of propaganda had to be escalated even further. This was essential in order to later present an appropriately adjusted version of the history of World War II. Experience had taught that there was never a shortage of compliant henchmen, among academics, in the broadband media, and among political actors, to accomplish this. The most hair-raising stories could be credibly drummed in, preferred ideologically coloured trends could be supplied with energy. Effective resistance has been suppressed ever since, through endless repetition and stigmatization of sceptics and those questioning the narrative.
During the war it became clear that a huge branch of the economy could be built up on the basis of this initiative. A gigantic fake news manufactory, supported by a horde of authors and filmmakers, who have been provided with a secure income for decades. One has to ask oneself how this group of people would have made a living without the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. (“Nazis” for those who cannot manage to bring the word “socialist” across their lips in this context) To ensure that the propaganda narrative stays alive and kicking, the year 2022 has been ushered in with two “new” film productions to hit the German movie-scene, coupled with a seemingly endless circuit of repetitions.
And there is still the option of engaging in “post-colonial studies” with which to earn a living, as it is popular these days. Other scapegoats on whom these zeitgeist-conforming ideologues, can focus their energy are easily found and invented. 

This sorry state of affairs, propped up as it is by an assortment of interest groups, led to the emergence of a new branch of the opinion control industry. After being around in various forms for centuries and in relative obscurity, now was the time to engage overdrive. Banning, censoring, supressing and denouncing sceptical enquiry into the “official narrative”, became the order of the day. Some of the original stories that were cooked up, were so far-fetched that even the most gullible consumers had to ask questions, so those stories were quickly culled. Those that survived became protected to the extent that sceptics, in the worst case, could face the wrath of a corrupt judiciary in some countries. Since the emergence of the alternative media, those tools of opinion control were in danger of losing their effectiveness, so “independent fact checkers” had to be thrown to the front. Blocking of accounts, shadow banning and “naughty stickers” are applied by face book, twitter, YouTube, Instagram, PayPal etc. Even the United Nations has to be roped in at times. In January 2022 its General Assembly (195 member states) passed a resolution by consensus, drafted by two member states, but without putting it to the vote. We live in a truly democratic world and as you probably guessed, the resolution concerns the most protected story ever, shrouding it even better from sceptical enquiry. When all else fails, there is still the organised “shit storm” to intimidate and denounce those that refuse to “shut up and play nice”.